‘No Thanks!’ blog Top Ten posts 2017

Well, another year in a Scotland increasingly weary of nationalism draws to a fractious close and I take my annual look at the No Thanks! Top Ten most-read posts.

As usual, the list is dominated by articles that touch on the SNP. The occasional nationalist who dips into this blog with a wary toe sometimes accosts me after the experience with a tweet along the lines of ‘You must hate Scotland/the SNP’, the two terms often being interchangeable in their minds. I usually respond, if at all, that I hate very little in this life, and certainly not a country or this particular political party.

The SNP features here so frequently for three reasons:

  1. I am opposed both in principle and on pragmatic grounds to their one fundamental aim – the independence (I prefer the word separation) of Scotland from Britain
  2. no other political party or grouping stands a snowball’s chance in hell of achieving that aim
  3. when all is said and done they’re not very good at government and much of what they’re poor at can be related directly to their one over-riding aim.

So here are the ten most read posts on the No Thanks! blog in 2017, beginning in traditional pop chart fashion with No. 10 and working up to this year’s No. 1.

No. 10

A subject that has increasingly wound up many Scottish nationalists to a fever pitch of solidarity and anticipation – Spain, Catalonia and Scottish nationalism – with no doubt more excitement to come in 2018. Historically, there is little to link Scotland and Catalonia but, hell, they want to be separate too and they might succeed so let’s pile in. A search for ‘Catalonia’ on this blog will reveal a number of occasions when that region of Spain has featured. It remains a tricky subject for the high heid yins of the SNP, so keen to stress all that civic and inclusive stuff, and still wedded to the idea of Scottish membership of the EU. But it’s not, as they say, my problem.

No. 9

Coincidentally, my September post Lost – SNP group photo also featured Catalonia, or more accurately a group of SNP ‘staffers’ (one also appears later in this chart) who posed with some separatist Catalan flags in the Holyrood parliament building. Presumably because they shouldn’t have taken a photo of a ‘party political nature or for party political purposes’ (parliamentary house rules) the image disappeared soon after it was posted on social media. As you’ll see, the poor wee creatures hadn’t read the first rule of the web – nothing disappears in cyberspace.

No. 8

Although it dated from 2016, Is someone telling porkies? The SNP ‘National Survey’ response seemed to find continuing favour this year. If you don’t remember, the survey was part of the continuing SNP pretence that they want to have a ‘national conversation’, find out what unionists think and why, woo us in a summer of love etc. etc. The unfortunate Stewart Hosie was to have led the exercise until he was caught sharing something at Westminster with Angus MacNeil that he shouldn’t have. The ‘porkies’ post nailed the SNP lie that two million people had responded to their egregious survey (aka marketing exercise).

No. 7

On the etymology of the word ‘yoon’ was another oldie that continued to find favour, presumably as additional innocent Scots found themselves dubbed a ‘yoon’ and googled the word to found out what it meant.

No. 6

Back in April I asked Are these SNP MPs on a shoogly peg? after Theresa May made her flawed decision to call a general election. I identified fifteen who looked as if they might be and got eight of them right. Whether that puts me up with the Brahan Seer I’ll leave you to decide. But I guessed the demise of (ex-)big hitters Salmond and Angus Robertson correctly. Losers also included one or two other vexatious individuals, not to mention the many not on my list who bit the dust to make the party’s Westminster contingent a much reduced force. Hanging on to the almost-shoogliest remaining peg is Perth MP Pete Wishart, with a parliamentary majority of twenty-one: Pete also features in No. 7 above and No. 4 below (the shoogliest peg is occupied by Stephen Gethins, majority two).

No. 5

Another general election-related post, Has Scotland gone mad politically? told the story of a nurse who asked Nicola Sturgeon an awkward question on a TV panel discussion. In what could only be described as a witch hunt, leading SNP politicians sought to discredit her with all sorts of baseless accusations and insinuations. If you’re new hereabouts, welcome to nationalist Scotland and the sport of ‘Hunt a Yoon’.

No. 4

In the latest of his series of bizarre and erratic tweets, Pete Wishart SNP MP linked the Scottish council elections to the ‘rape clause’ and invited electors to ‘vote till you boke’ and ‘Make sure the rape clause candidate is absolutley [sic] last’. In an accompanying meme he managed to dub candidates of the three main unionist parties as ‘Wank’, ‘Wankier’, and ‘Absolute Total Wank’. Low life? You decide.

No. 3

In a rare Brexit-related post I wrote An open letter to Gina Miller about the SNP urging her campaign group ‘Best for Britain’ not to fund SNP candidates in the then forthcoming general election. Whatever your view on the EU, the irony of a group called ‘Best for Britain’ funding the SNP cannot be lost on you. As it turned out, they decided not to fund SNP candidates. Correct decision.

No. 2

The curious story of the thirteen No-voting GPs who all became Yes voters was a cracker, an SNP ‘staffer’ (yes, one of them again) who claimed precisely that. It seemed to have been a Damascene conversion almost overnight because of ‘TM’ (Theresa May) although I guess some may now be seeking employment South of the border due to Scotland’s forthcoming higher income tax rates. The alleged source was his mother-in-law. But his erroneous claim proved as long-lasting as snow on a dyke and he put his Twitter account, where his claim appeared, on lock down with all his tweets protected. Still, you could put in a request to follow him and then ask if he still stands by his allegation.

No. 1

This was the most-read post on the blog in 2017.

Back in April Council elections 2017 Part 1: Your handy guide to some SNP candidates (and non-candidates) I looked at some of the stranger and less salubrious individuals who threatened to stand for the party. Most did although some fell by the wayside before the election. Some were elected, some weren’t. I never checked after the election to see who made the cut. Reading the whole thing again now is probably a task too tedious to endure. But if you do, see if you can spot the candidate who:

  • called unionists ‘quislings’ (more than one)
  • seemed to be friends with the BNP’s Nick Griffin
  • changed their surname to appear further up the ballot paper
  • believed Scotland has suffered ‘300 years of pillaging’
  • advocated UDI for Scotland
  • posted a picture of a noose along with the names of several Labour MSPs
  • forgot he owned a hotel when he declared his interests as a councillor
  • seemed to support the Provisional IRA (also more than one)
  • compared David Cameron and Boris Johnson to Ian Brady and Myra Hindley
  • were members of the so-called ‘Monklands Mafia’.

It’s not a pretty picture and it’s far removed from the smooth-speaking party leaders who’ve had the media training. But it reveals some deeper truths about the SNP and many of its members.

I naively thought in 2014 that I’d be able to discontinue the No Thanks! blog after our ‘once in a generation’ referendum. Now I suspect I’ll be back next year with another Top Ten. See you then.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

The bridge, the bridge …

Here’s a strange thing about the bridge that’ll get me pelters from all sides. [Note for non-Scottish readers: the Queensferry Crossing is a new road bridge across the Firth of Forth]

I welcome the work that’s being done on it and will have to be done on it probably over the next year – not the five days that transport Humza Yousaf claimed erroneously in his tweet (above).

It was a massive engineering project and a spectacular design to add to its two equally impressive neighbours. There may have been political pressure to get it opened as soon as possible and like many I regret that its design, construction and the materials it was built of were almost entirely sourced abroad. I don’t even like the fact that as soon as it’s built it has to be lit up in the colours of the saltire to prove its oor bridge built by oor SNP. And there may yet be unpalatable facts to emerge about some of the issues around the present and future lane restrictions (even temporary closures?).

But it is a darned great complex civil engineering project and there are bound to be teething troubles that need to be sorted out.

No, the issue that well and truly gets my goat is the SNP’s obfuscation on the subject, exemplified by Mr Yousaf’s tweet. It’s a classic of its kind.

  • It uses the phrase ‘planned milestone’ to hide the fact that what has happened just now was not planned (if it had been it would have been announced well in advance).
  • It tries to convert what is clearly a problem into a positive – the raising of the speed limit on the bridge (a limit it was supposed to have been designed to in the first place).
  • It mentions only the five days closure but not any longer term works (see the ‘next year’ link above).
  • And of course it gets ‘weather permitting’ in as an excuse, just in case.

The Transport Scotland tweet he appends is not much better, either in itself or in the information on their web site it links to. But I imagine they were under some political pressure to present this as a positive improvement, not a problem.

There is a fundamental dishonesty in this that the SNP get themselves trapped into time and again. Things aren’t just done, they have to be shown as triumphs for the party and the nation, achieved in spite of Westminster and something that none of the unionist parties would have bothered with (in the case of the bridge a nationalist told me precisely that online). The problem is that triumphs don’t always emerge from political decisions and then an excuse has to found, blame assigned (you can guess where) or, in this case, an obfuscation perpetrated.

The minister concerned could be seen as having a track record in this sort of thing. Readers with a long memory may recall his missing diaries from a Middle East trip when he held the egregious ‘external affairs’ portfolio. And of course he had a senior moment when he forgot to ensure that he was insured to drive someone’s car. You’ll observe incidentally that the errant diaries were only found/released following a Freedom of Information (FOI) request. That itself is all of a pattern, with a group of journalists recently expressing concern about how the Scottish government handle FOI requests. Obfuscation yet again.

How much better it would be if our government felt they could be honest about the risk inherent in large projects and spell those out in advance. Who knows, they might even save themselves some turmoil and blunt some of the criticism that comes their way. But after eleven years in government, it’s clearly too late to teach the old nationalist dog new tricks.

A brooding Queensferry Crossing on its opening weekend


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 8 Comments

Not another ****** strategy! How many does a nation need?


The tail end of a few days away meant I missed last week’s fun and games (?) at the SNP government’s Arctic Circle Forum in Edinburgh, somewhat South of the Arctic Circle, but who cares.

Like the international wandering albatross that she is (I know, wrong hemisphere and I’ve used the metaphor before) Nicola Sturgeon returned from wherever she’d last been to put on a show that elicited this encomium from the Arctic Circle chairman and former president of Iceland Ólafur Ragnar Grímsson:

The new Arctic neighbourhood needs Scotland.

Aye that’s right Ólafur.  Here’s tae ye! I’m sure they speak of little else in the neighbourhoods of Moscow and Ottawa.

I’ve written before of the SNP’s fascination with things Nordic and especially the Arctic Circle talk shop.

As you’ll realise if you put tveir and tveir together, what interested me in this particular bash was not its happening but the fact that Fiona Hyslop, cabinet secretary i/c external affairs (that’s right, we both know it’s not a devolved function) used the Edinburgh forum to announce that our SNP government is going to develop ‘an Arctic Strategy for Scotland.’ Just what we need, along with a Mediterranean Strategy and strategies for other places we haven’t got a lot in common with.

If you had the will to search the manifesto that brought a diminished minority of  SNP MSPs back into government at Holyrood in 2016, you’d find on page 41 reference to a ‘Nordic/Baltic Strategy.’ Personally, I was never aware of such a thing, as I assume MSPs were unaware of the Arctic Strategy until they read about it in the government press release. It’s not clear if these are to be two separate strategies or overlapping or just ‘Oh God, did we say that?’

You see the SNP are particularly prone to strategies.

You’ll find no fewer than twenty-nine in that 2016 manifesto, ranging from a Scottish STEM Strategy to a National Strategy to Tackle Social Isolation. So now we have thirty. Or thirty-one if you include the renewable energy strategy they’re going to help Malawi to develop (lucky old Malawi, all that expertise being brought to bear). Excluding their African side excursion, that’s one strategy to be produced or updated every two months over the five-year life of the current parliament (a few are older efforts being, as they say, ‘refreshed’). And that’s without allowing for parliamentary recesses.

Life’s too short to check how they’ve done so far with all this. But do you think that rate of strategy production is sustainable? I doubt it. And I doubt even if it’s needed. High-level usually glossy documents are a great temptation for governments. I wouldn’t be so cynical as to suggest that the inevitable colour photo and foreword by the relevant minister is the incentive. But you do have to ask how many of these productions generate anything more than marginal change.

It would be good if the SNP concentrated on the day-to-day services they’re responsible for rather than fritter away their time and resources on so many strategies, some of which are as much use as their Arctic Strategy is likely to be.

It would be good but not likely.

The full list of strategies in the SNP 2016 Holyrood manifesto:


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Beyond foolishness – George Kerevan and Catalonia

In my last post on this blog (The SNP lifeboat disaster) I had some mild fun at the expense of the SNP’s Pete Wishart MP, albeit MP by only 21 votes. George Kerevan is one of Pete’s ex-MP colleagues who didn’t make the cut at the last general election. This doesn’t seem to have dimmed his enthusiasm for all sorts of things, from announcing an intention to apply for the job of chair of the UK Financial Conduct Authority to supporting the recent illegal Catalan ‘referendum,’ where I clocked him ‘observing’ events recently.

His misguided tweet at the head of this article continues his interest in Catalonia and demonstrates a number of things.

The first, perhaps trivial in itself, is that he thinks there is something called ‘marshal’ law. It is of course ‘martial,’ that is military, law. Perhaps like ‘parly’ for ‘parlt’ (parliament) it’s just a typo although he’s obviously spent some time on the message, sourcing an image of the Polish and, ironically, legitimate Catalan flags (the separatist flag is the one with a blue triangle and white star down the side).

The second issue is that his tweet illustrates perfectly the hazard of drawing historical analogies from a standpoint of ignorance. Kerevan’s statement that martial law was imposed in Poland ‘to crush democracy’ is at best ambiguous, at worst misleading. It could be taken to mean that, like Catalonia, there had been a democratic state to crush. In fact ever since the second world war Poland had been a communist satellite of the Soviet Union. What the military were seeking to crush was the unrest that by 1981 was articulated mainly through the Solidarity trade union and which had many causes, not just a lack of democracy. During the period of martial law from 1981-1983 and for some time afterwards, Solidarity attempted to continue covertly. But its leaders were arrested and there is no way it could be characterised, as per Mr Kerevan, as an ‘underground state.’

The third issue is the conclusion Kerevan draws from his faulty analogy. If the Catalan parliament were suspended, he says, Catalans should also set up an underground state. But unlike Poland in the 1980s Spain is a democracy and any suspension would be done in accordance with the democratic constitution (Article 155 if you must know). That would not be a declaration of martial law. The Spanish government may not have been wise in every aspect of how it has dealt with Catalan separatists recently. But there is no doubt that the fundamental actions it has taken and that it might now take are in accordance with the constitution. To suggest in that context that Catalonia’s politicians should set up an underground state is hugely irresponsible, much more so than supporting the recent illegal referendum. I wonder if Kerevan has thought through the implications of how that might play out. It certainly advocates more illegality and, knowingly or not, could be tantamount to encouraging civil war.

George has featured previously in this blog, for example last year when he articulated a belief that Scotland had a ‘new oil boom’ and then got more than a bit lost in Berlin. That was mere foolishness. To encourage Catalan separatists to set up an underground state is dangerous.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

The SNP lifeboat disaster

Wikimedia Commons

We have the opportunity, there’s a lifeboat attached to the good ship UK that’s heading for that Brexit iceberg – it’s called Scottish independence. Let’s get on board that lifeboat, let’s row as fast as possible.

– Pete Wishart MP, quoted in The Scotsman

Never the master of metaphor, Pete Wishart SNP MP chose a stark comparison to enliven his talk at an SNP conference fringe meeting yesterday organised by the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA). I don’t know if anyone told Pete what brand of economics the IEA stands for but, trust me, it doesn’t fit with the cuddly progressive image the party chooses to cultivate.

In an idle moment over my breakfast rowie, his words had me musing that being marooned in a lifeboat with some of the SNP’s prominent figures might be one of my visions of hell. Perhaps not in the best of taste (but we are talking Wishart here and he started it), his words reminded me of the photo above of one of the lifeboats of the Titanic, its occupants about to be rescued by another ship – itself a useful extension of Pete’s metaphor since the one thing we can be sure of in an independent Scotland run by the SNP is that its economy would need rescuing by someone else.

Anyhow, in my nightmare of lifeboat hell, I was struggling to think who my fellow occupants might be. Who would take charge? Who’d be navigating? Which horny-handed sons of toil would bend to the oars and ‘row as fast as possible’? Was there a mutineer on board? Would someone sacrifice themselves for the greater good by jumping overboard in the dead of night? Who would huddle whimpering in the bilges terrified of the journey ahead?

Luckily The Scotsman has a report on the disaster in its edition dated 31 May 2019.

A month after Brexit and the disappearance in a River Clyde tragedy of the MV SNP, Royal Navy frigate HMS Glasgow yesterday located the vessel’s drifting lifeboat West of St Kilda, flying a tattered ‘Yes’ saltire.

‘It was a pathetic sight,’ said frigate Captain Philip Jones. ‘The crew had all survived but they were in an emaciated state. Shortage of supplies had led to all sorts of problems on the boat.’

When asked to elaborate on the ‘problems’ Capt. Jones declined to comment. But following an investigation by Scotsman reporters grim details of the disastrous voyage emerged.

‘The fundamental problem,’ said one informant who declined to give their name, ‘was that we had plenty of people with a vision of where we were heading and who were willing to take charge but no-one prepared to do the hard work of rowing.’

In off-the-record comments, details emerged of a stand-up row between Alex S. and Nicola S. about the direction and speed of travel that nearly ended in a disastrous capsize.

Many of the crew, according to our informant, turned out to be unfit and incapable of physical activity. In one case it required two seamen to pull on one oar, junior crew members Angus McN. and Stewart H. ‘Even though they were doubling up,’ said our informant, ‘that seemed to lead to constant arguments. No-one could understand why.’

Meantime, shorter and shorter shifts had to be devised for overweight crew members who could row. One elderly crew member, Jim S., proved enthusiastic and willing but had to be removed from duty as he persistently rowed in the wrong direction.

Long-serving second in command John S. attempted to organise training in basic skills but rowing performance declined throughout the ordeal.

Asked why they had ended up somewhere West of St Kilda, coxswain Derek M., in charge of navigation, said, ‘I used a calculator. What more could I do?’

In the most shocking incident, it was revealed that some un-named survivors had attempted to push good-natured musician Pete W. off the boat. ‘It was horrifying,’ said our informant, ‘the guy had only been trying to keep spirits up by singing a beautiful song called “Going Home.” I’m afraid the endless dirge-like repetition just made some comrades snap.’

The crew are now recovering in a naval hospital at Faslane on the Clyde where HMS Glasgow landed them earlier today. They are said to be shaken by their ordeal and not sure if they will go to sea again.

[Ed. – names have been withheld to protect the anonymity of survivors]

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Spain, Catalonia and Scottish nationalism

Not for the first time, I find myself thinking and writing about events of some significance in other countries, in this case Spain, through a peculiarly parochial Scottish lens. This may seem strange to non-Scots but they need to understand how Scottish nationalists use and abuse those events to pursue their own aim of separation from the United Kingdom.

Let me lay my cards on the table about Catalonia.

First, some background. Spain is a democracy, a fellow member (until we leave) of the EU, and an ally in NATO, all things incidentally which the SNP have said they want a separate Scotland to be. The country emerged, almost entirely peacefully, from the fascist dictatorship of Francisco Franco in the 1970s. Its politicians, of virtually every party, developed a democratic constitution that was approved in a national referendum in 1978. The constitution says it is:

based on the indissoluble unity of the Spanish Nation, the common and indivisible homeland of all Spaniards; it recognises and guarantees the right to selfgovernment of the nationalities and regions of which it is composed and the solidarity among them all (Section 2).

It also provides for a constitutional court (Part IX) to which:

the Government may appeal … against provisions and resolutions adopted by the bodies of the Self-governing Communities [the regions] … (Section 161).

The constitution was approved overwhelmingly in a referendum, including by 95% of those voting in Catalonia (the full results are here).

Fast forward to 2014, and the then Catalan separatist government attempted to hold a referendum on separation which the court ruled illegal and which the regional government converted into a ‘citizen participation process’ (sic) to get round the ban. Most opposition parties and non-nationalists boycotted the poll and although 81% of those voting opted for independence it was on a turnout of only about 40%. So of the total electorate only about 32% actually turned out and voted for separation.

This year’s ‘referendum’ was also declared illegal (strictly speaking, suspended) by the constitutional court but the current separatist government decided to go ahead anyhow. The Spanish government’s attempts to stop the process were all made in accordance with the rule of law, seeking court approval for all their actions. The only aspect I would disagree with was the heavy-handed actions of the national police forces (Guardia Civil and Policia Nacional) on and around polling day. Even then, evidence has emerged of how some separatists goaded the police and may have falsified or exaggerated injuries to make those heavy-handed actions look worse.

In this context, the electoral process was itself deeply flawed by normal standards, with voters able to print off ballot papers online and vote at any open polling station. For what it’s worth (maybe not much), the result claimed by the Catalan government was 90% in favour of independence on a 42.3% turnout. So of the total electorate only a claimed 38% actually turned out and voted for separation.

I give this lengthy preamble because, on the facts, you might expect the SNP (remember my point about all those things that Spain is they want a separate Scotland to be) to tread cautiously on the subject, even if some of the fringe elements of Scottish nationalism would feel less circumscribed.

Not a bit of it.

It began with a relatively muted statement by cabinet secretary Fiona Hyslop (i/c ‘external affairs’ although of course the Scottish parliament has no locus in the subject) urging the model of the Edinburgh agreement as a way to proceed. Even that mis-interpreted the right to self-determination in the ‘UN Charter’ (sic), something a government lawyer might have picked up.

In the run-up to the poll, Joanna Cherry, SNP MP and as she insists QC, had opined during a pro-Catalan separatist meeting at the Sheraton Grand Hotel in Edinburgh that the ‘referendum’ was legal, although in print at least she offered no proof and her opinion (presumably personal rather than legal since her practice was unrelated to constitutional law) runs counter to the facts above.

By the day of the poll there seemed to be a number of current and ex- SNP MPs and MSPs swanning around Catalonia spotting all sorts of positives for separation (‘I saw flags everywhere’ – Paul Monaghan) and negatives against Spain (‘Here’s a video clip of some police who told me to stop filming’ – Margaret Ferrier). A couple of them seemed to be part of an ‘official’ delegation. Plaid Cymru and Sinn Fein featured too if my memory’s correct. Bringing up the rear as ‘observers’ were five crowd-funded members of English Scots for Yes, led by an ex-SNP councillor (surname Campbell, so definitely English) who has featured in this blog before.

Many questions could be asked about the objectivity of this gaggle of partisan amateurs but I’ll confine myself to what you might ask of a properly-constituted international team of observers. Who invited you? Who are your team members and what expertise do they have? How were they chosen? How were they trained? How long were they there? What did they do? Where is their report of what they saw? Properly constituted international observation of elections and referendums has a long and honourable tradition – see this example on our own 2014 referendum. I doubt very much whether any of the SNP observers were members of groups that conformed to international standards.

Spurred no doubt by images of police behaviour before the poll and on the day, there was also a lot of inappropriate online comment from nationalists who may or may not have been SNP members. Spain was characterised as ‘totalitarian’, ‘Francoist’ and ‘fascist’ by people who either didn’t know or care what they were saying. I know Spain (see Footnote) and it is none of these things.

I see that The National newspaper today has a headline that reads:

Sturgeon: You can’t ignore 2m votes.

That’s ironic, given the numbers, the majority, who voted No in the referendum that she so wanted in 2014.

In fact, the whole SNP jumping-on-the-bandwagon of the Catalan poll looks as if it’s backfiring. Still at least notionally committed to EU membership, they have not only antagonised Spain but find themselves at odds with the EU, who have condemned the illegal Catalan referendum. The wilder fringe elements of Scottish nationalism baying ‘Hold our own poll regardless of Westminster’ or even ‘Declare UDI now’ may turn out to be the least of Ms Sturgeon’s problems.

Footnote. To any passing nationalists who interpret this post as a mere unionist taking advantage of a situation to criticise the SNP, I probably know and understand Spain better than most of you. I first visited the country when Franco was still alive, I sat and waited while a Spanish friend attended a clandestine political meeting (PSOE), left a literary competition with him rapidly when he couldn’t contain his anger at the sycophancy of the entries, feared for him and his family when there was an attempted military coup in 1981, marvelled when King Juan Carlos in army uniform refused to meet the mutineers and told them to go back to their barracks. For all its faults, I love the country very much. Spain is not what the SNP and other Scottish nationalists claim.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 11 Comments

Nationalist fools rush in to support illegal Catalan ‘referendum’

Tomorrow in Edinburgh, there is an event ‘in defense [sic] of the right of the Catalan people to decide its own future.’ The phrase ‘fools rush in where angels fear to tread’ came to mind when I saw the agenda and list of speakers:

I’d quarrel with what the Catalan separatists are doing but not the right of the two speakers from Catalonia to speak about their situation. One, by the way, you’ll see is secretary of the hitherto unheard-of ‘Catalan National Assembly in Scotland.’ The fools are the Scottish politicians, who have allowed their names to be included in an agenda that disingenuously claims:

At this point it’s not about defending Catalan independence, it’s simply about democracy.

Put in technical terms, this statement is a pile of horse poo.

Spain is a democracy, a member of the EU that the SNP hold in such high regard, and an ally in NATO. Its constitution was approved overwhelmingly by the electorate in 1978 including over 90% of voters in Catalonia. The constitution allows for a constitutional court and it is this court that has declared the ‘referendum’ illegal. If you follow the detail of the follow-up to that decision by the Spanish authorities, you will often see a statement that an action, for example for the police to seize voting equipment, was approved by a court or judge. In other words, the Catalan separatists may not like it, but everything to stop the illegal vote has been done in accordance with the rule of law.

Let’s look now at the five politicians who are either naïve enough not to understand this or who put support of the illegal referendum above the law.

  1. Joanna Cherry MP, QC and SNP. What in God’s name is a senior lawyer doing here? More than a member of any other profession, she might be expected to support that rule of law in another democracy. Along with 21 other members of an all-party parliamentary group on Catalonia she recently signed a letter claiming the Spanish government’s actions on the illegal Catalan referendum were ‘an affront to democracy.’ To ensure the letter had maximum impact in Spain they had it published in The Guardian. Of the 22 signatories, 15 were SNP and 3 Plaid Cymru. What a surprise. (Other examples of Ms Cherry’s political judgement can be found elsewhere in this blog, including here)
  2. Kenneth Gibson MSP and SNP. An otherwise invisible backbencher, his only known interest in foreign affairs in Holyrood is his membership of a cross-party group on Malawi.
  3. Ivan McKee MSP and SNP. Formerly of the mainly-SNP front group Business for Scotland, he received his reward for loyal service with a candidacy at the last Holyrood election. Member of cross-party groups on the Nordic countries, Palestine and Poland.
  4. John Finnie, MSP and Scottish Green, a party of little numerical importance whose only influence (and precious little at that) comes from their ability to give the SNP a majority in Holyrood if they choose. Confirming through his attendance here that his party is more interested in nationalism than the environment and sustainability.
  5. George Kerevan, ex-MP SNP. I include him as a politician as an act of kindness since he was rejected by his electorate at the last election. [A few hours after writing this I saw in the Financial Times that Mr Kerevan intends to apply for the ‘top post’ at the Financial Conduct Authority. I’m not sure this sort of stuff will look good on the CV]

And that’s it. A stellar cast. Sounds a fun evening. It’s in The Sheraton Grand Hotel (and Spa), so that should keep out the riff-raff like the Scottish Resistance, all six of them, who occupied the Spanish consulate in Edinburgh ‘for a few minutes’ today. Their spokesman described their brief visit as ‘successful.’ I mention them because, in truth, the event in the Sheraton tomorrow has as much justification as their wee demo. As I said, fools rush in.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 9 Comments