Not another ****** strategy! How many does a nation need?

 

The tail end of a few days away meant I missed last week’s fun and games (?) at the SNP government’s Arctic Circle Forum in Edinburgh, somewhat South of the Arctic Circle, but who cares.

Like the international wandering albatross that she is (I know, wrong hemisphere and I’ve used the metaphor before) Nicola Sturgeon returned from wherever she’d last been to put on a show that elicited this encomium from the Arctic Circle chairman and former president of Iceland Ólafur Ragnar Grímsson:

The new Arctic neighbourhood needs Scotland.

Aye right, Ólafur.  Here’s tae ye! I’m sure they speak of little else in the neighbourhoods of Moscow and Ottawa.

I’ve written before of the SNP’s fascination with things Nordic and especially the Arctic Circle talk shop.

As you’ll realise if you put tveir and tveir together, what interested me in this particular bash was not its happening but the fact that Fiona Hyslop, cabinet secretary i/c external affairs (that’s right, we both know it’s not a devolved function) used the Edinburgh forum to announce that our SNP government is going to develop ‘an Arctic Strategy for Scotland.’ Just what we need, along with a Mediterranean Strategy and strategies for other places we haven’t got a lot in common with.

If you had the will to search the manifesto that brought a diminished minority of  SNP MSPs back into government at Holyrood in 2016, you’d find on page 41 reference to a ‘Nordic/Baltic Strategy.’ Personally, I was never aware of such a thing, as I assume MSPs were unaware of the Arctic Strategy until they read about it in the government press release. It’s not clear if these are to be two separate strategies or overlapping or just ‘Oh God, did we say that?’

You see the SNP are particularly prone to strategies.

You’ll find no fewer than twenty-nine in that 2016 manifesto, ranging from a Scottish STEM Strategy to a National Strategy to Tackle Social Isolation. So now we have thirty. Or thirty-one if you include the renewable energy strategy they’re going to help Malawi to develop (lucky old Malawi, all that expertise being brought to bear). Excluding their African side excursion, that’s one strategy to be produced or updated every two months over the five-year life of the current parliament (a few are older efforts being, as they say, ‘refreshed’). And that’s without allowing for parliamentary recesses.

Life’s too short to check how they’ve done so far with all this. But do you think that rate of strategy production is sustainable? I doubt it. And I doubt even if it’s needed. High-level usually glossy documents are a great temptation for governments. I wouldn’t be so cynical as to suggest that the inevitable colour photo and foreword by the relevant minister is the incentive. But you do have to ask how many of these productions generate anything more than marginal change.

It would be good if the SNP concentrated on the day-to-day services they’re responsible for rather than fritter away their time and resources on so many strategies, some of which are as much use as their Arctic Strategy is likely to be.

It would be good but not likely.

The full list of strategies in the SNP 2016 Holyrood manifesto:

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Not another ****** strategy! How many does a nation need?

  1. Sam Duncan says:

    “Edinburgh, somewhat South of the Arctic Circle”

    The absolute, uttermost, northerly point of Scotland – Out Stack in Shetland – is, as near as makes no odds, 400 miles from the Arctic Circle. Every last square inch of Scotland is closer to the English border (and vice-versa) than any part of it is to the Arctic, by quite some margin. Holyrood has absolutely no business whatsoever monkeying around with Arctic Assemblies.

    “Working closer with our northern neighbours”

    Who are more than 800 miles away. But furiously distancing ourselves at every available opportunity (and a few that aren’t) from our actual neighbours on this very island.

    “It would be good if the SNP concentrated on the day-to-day services they’re responsible for rather than fritter away their time and resources on so many strategies”

    Indeed. I’m often reminded of the line the Goons used to trot out whenever they had a scene set in Parliament: “I don’t care about all that; what about the drains in Hackney?” Or, if you prefer, the washin’ greens in Govanhill.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.