Spain, Catalonia and Scottish nationalism

Not for the first time, I find myself thinking and writing about events of some significance in other countries, in this case Spain, through a peculiarly parochial Scottish lens. This may seem strange to non-Scots but they need to understand how Scottish nationalists use and abuse those events to pursue their own aim of separation from the United Kingdom.

Let me lay my cards on the table about Catalonia.

First, some background. Spain is a democracy, a fellow member (until we leave) of the EU, and an ally in NATO, all things incidentally which the SNP have said they want a separate Scotland to be. The country emerged, almost entirely peacefully, from the fascist dictatorship of Francisco Franco in the 1970s. Its politicians, of virtually every party, developed a democratic constitution that was approved in a national referendum in 1978. The constitution says it is:

based on the indissoluble unity of the Spanish Nation, the common and indivisible homeland of all Spaniards; it recognises and guarantees the right to selfgovernment of the nationalities and regions of which it is composed and the solidarity among them all (Section 2).

It also provides for a constitutional court (Part IX) to which:

the Government may appeal … against provisions and resolutions adopted by the bodies of the Self-governing Communities [the regions] … (Section 161).

The constitution was approved overwhelmingly in a referendum, including by 95% of those voting in Catalonia (the full results are here).

Fast forward to 2014, and the then Catalan separatist government attempted to hold a referendum on separation which the court ruled illegal and which the regional government converted into a ‘citizen participation process’ (sic) to get round the ban. Most opposition parties and non-nationalists boycotted the poll and although 81% of those voting opted for independence it was on a turnout of only about 40%. So of the total electorate only about 32% actually turned out and voted for separation.

This year’s ‘referendum’ was also declared illegal (strictly speaking, suspended) by the constitutional court but the current separatist government decided to go ahead anyhow. The Spanish government’s attempts to stop the process were all made in accordance with the rule of law, seeking court approval for all their actions. The only aspect I would disagree with was the heavy-handed actions of the national police forces (Guardia Civil and Policia Nacional) on and around polling day. Even then, evidence has emerged of how some separatists goaded the police and may have falsified or exaggerated injuries to make those heavy-handed actions look worse.

In this context, the electoral process was itself deeply flawed by normal standards, with voters able to print off ballot papers online and vote at any open polling station. For what it’s worth (maybe not much), the result claimed by the Catalan government was 90% in favour of independence on a 42.3% turnout. So of the total electorate only a claimed 38% actually turned out and voted for separation.

I give this lengthy preamble because, on the facts, you might expect the SNP (remember my point about all those things that Spain is they want a separate Scotland to be) to tread cautiously on the subject, even if some of the fringe elements of Scottish nationalism would feel less circumscribed.

Not a bit of it.

It began with a relatively muted statement by cabinet secretary Fiona Hyslop (i/c ‘external affairs’ although of course the Scottish parliament has no locus in the subject) urging the model of the Edinburgh agreement as a way to proceed. Even that mis-interpreted the right to self-determination in the ‘UN Charter’ (sic), something a government lawyer might have picked up.

In the run-up to the poll, Joanna Cherry, SNP MP and as she insists QC, had opined during a pro-Catalan separatist meeting at the Sheraton Grand Hotel in Edinburgh that the ‘referendum’ was legal, although in print at least she offered no proof and her opinion (presumably personal rather than legal since her practice was unrelated to constitutional law) runs counter to the facts above.

By the day of the poll there seemed to be a number of current and ex- SNP MPs and MSPs swanning around Catalonia spotting all sorts of positives for separation (‘I saw flags everywhere’ – Paul Monaghan) and negatives against Spain (‘Here’s a video clip of some police who told me to stop filming’ – Margaret Ferrier). A couple of them seemed to be part of an ‘official’ delegation. Plaid Cymru and Sinn Fein featured too if my memory’s correct. Bringing up the rear as ‘observers’ were five crowd-funded members of English Scots for Yes, led by an ex-SNP councillor (surname Campbell, so definitely English) who has featured in this blog before.

Many questions could be asked about the objectivity of this gaggle of partisan amateurs but I’ll confine myself to what you might ask of a properly-constituted international team of observers. Who invited you? Who are your team members and what expertise do they have? How were they chosen? How were they trained? How long were they there? What did they do? Where is their report of what they saw? Properly constituted international observation of elections and referendums has a long and honourable tradition – see this example on our own 2014 referendum. I doubt very much whether any of the SNP observers were members of groups that conformed to international standards.

Spurred no doubt by images of police behaviour before the poll and on the day, there was also a lot of inappropriate online comment from nationalists who may or may not have been SNP members. Spain was characterised as ‘totalitarian’, ‘Francoist’ and ‘fascist’ by people who either didn’t know or care what they were saying. I know Spain (see Footnote) and it is none of these things.

I see that The National newspaper today has a headline that reads:

Sturgeon: You can’t ignore 2m votes.

That’s ironic, given the numbers, the majority, who voted No in the referendum that she so wanted in 2014.

In fact, the whole SNP jumping-on-the-bandwagon of the Catalan poll looks as if it’s backfiring. Still at least notionally committed to EU membership, they have not only antagonised Spain but find themselves at odds with the EU, who have condemned the illegal Catalan referendum. The wilder fringe elements of Scottish nationalism baying ‘Hold our own poll regardless of Westminster’ or even ‘Declare UDI now’ may turn out to be the least of Ms Sturgeon’s problems.

Footnote. To any passing nationalists who interpret this post as a mere unionist taking advantage of a situation to criticise the SNP, I probably know and understand Spain better than most of you. I first visited the country when Franco was still alive, I sat and waited while a Spanish friend attended a clandestine political meeting (PSOE), left a literary competition with him rapidly when he couldn’t contain his anger at the sycophancy of the entries, feared for him and his family when there was an attempted military coup in 1981, marvelled when King Juan Carlos in army uniform refused to meet the mutineers and told them to go back to their barracks. For all its faults, I love the country very much. Spain is not what the SNP and other Scottish nationalists claim.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Spain, Catalonia and Scottish nationalism

  1. Kerry Gill says:

    Was waiting for a breath of fresh air on the events of the last few days, and finally have got it. Thank you.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Gerry Henry says:

    Now that was GOOD. keep it up.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Davey says:

    Excellent blog post as always Roger, thanks for your insight and actual Spanish knowledge and experience.
    I feel the SNP and the independence crowd made 2 massive mistakes this week, support of the illegal Catalan ref and the fracking ban. Their support for the illegal undemocratic take over is going to come back and hurt them big time. If the situation can not be resolved and the UDI the Catalonian politicians whispering about comes to fruition there will be global condemnation of this act. There will be no support for this act from the E.U. UN etc and nearly all governments of the world, the SNP will find themselves in a bloc of N.Korea, Venezuela, Cuba, the bloke in a store cupboard and prob Russia (who will be rubbing their hands together in glee at the prospect of damaging the E.U.) so prob won’t be a good look for the Scots Nationalists seen to be fermenting breakup of other nations and been aligned with that crowd, and they probably now guaranteed Spain would veto an Indy Scotland’s E.U. membership if they were ever to win a independence referendum.
    The other big problem for them is if the Catalans do manage to declare independence of some sort it will quickly become apparent that it is not an easy task risking things like capitol flight and the loss of a lot of the economy plus the brain drain. It will be seen as crazy act and scots voters will prob look over to Cataln and say “no thanks”.
    One of the most shocking thing from the SNP has been the behaviour of some of there politicians regarding the politics of another country (Remember the calls back in 2014 of salmond etc telling people to keep their noses out of Scottish business) . Well George Kerevan is a Non politician as such now so his opinions don’t carry as much weight but J. Cherry & D. Chapman are playing a very dangerous game, so very disappointing to see elected MPs doing this and interfering where they are not needed. They are servants to us the tax payer, the electorate. Their duty is to represent there constituents not be on fun jollys of independence tourism. It’s possible all the Catalan ref talk from the Scottish government is probably the latest ‘squirrel’ been thrown to distract from there generally poor record in governance and to placate all the crowd that have been marched up the the hill by Sturgeon to be left there till at least 2021 I guess maybe a generation.
    All in all I will have to say the approach by the Spanish government has been very poor, will never condone the use of violence against unarmed citizens but it is possible to see both acts as wrong and I won’t defend there policing but as seen by many a tourist and football fans the Spanish police in all its forms are generally pretty baton happy and willing to wallop you without much of a warning as somebody observed a night on the Ramblas will usually end up with a couple of drunks getting a bit of baton action. Anyway Roger thanks for your work, keep it up and hopefully soon you will be rid of the horrors of nationalism.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Roger White says:

      Thank you for your thoughts and kind comments. I agree with almost everything you say (maybe everything!). I also found the violence of the police unacceptable. But it’s not a normal reaction to say ‘The police were rough, I want to make a different country.’ As always it’s just another excuse to add to the long list of nationalist excuses. Thanks again.


  4. Worth noting that the separatist ‘Junts pel SÍ’ and ‘Candidatura d’Unitat Popular’ declared the 2015 Catalan elections a de-facto referendum on independence, and that if they won, they would ‘have a “democratic mandate” to start a process to create an independent Catalonia’. That was the opportunity for Catalonians to vote in a fair process for independence if that was their wish.

    The two parties between them obtained 48.05% of votesonly 35.68% of the Catalan electorate. Thus, when presented with an opportunity to show their desire for independence from Spain with their votes, 64.32% of Catalans could be fairly said to have rejected the separatists.

    Worth also noting that the referenced ‘90% of voters in Catalonia’ approving the 1978 constitution equated to a respectable 61.43% of electorate.

    (Btw, on your ‘Artists don’t have to be close to government’ piece, mention was made of Lewis Grassic Gibbon; the essay the quote is excerpted from is online here (amongst other places)—he doesn’t hold back at all. It’s towards the end and worth reading if unfamiliar (I wasn’t).)

    Liked by 1 person

  5. arabest1 says:

    Good thoughtful post as usual Rodger.

    Just heard a second bank has withdrawn its head office from Catalonia…..this situation could get very messy, and will do the Scottish case for independence no favours whatever. As you point out, glib references to ‘freedom’ are most definitely preferable to any meaningful discussion of health, eduation, police, transport, economy….or the big voter turnoff…………..independence!

    Liked by 2 people

  6. Scotland, England, Wales and N.Ireland have all discovered by experience, that the SNP and Sinn Feinn never let the truth get in the way of a good story!


  7. Pingback: A busy 2017 #1 Referenda | Marcus Ampe's Space

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.