First thoughts on the possibility of another Scottish referendum

It’s four days since the first minister announced she wanted to hold another referendum and less than 24 hours since the prime minister responded with a firm ‘No,’ or at least a firm ‘Not yet.’ Already, a few preliminary points are worth making.

First, understand that until the UK government says, ‘Yes, please, have independence now and on your terms,’ the proponents of separatism will never be satisfied. In fact, even if they got it, there would still be a post-separation narrative that blames the UK for the many problems that would inevitably assail an independent Scotland.

Which leads neatly to a second point. Don’t be fooled by the issue of EU membership, the SNP’s current casus belli. If the EU weren’t the excuse for the recent apoplectic state of the party’s leadership, it would be something else. Over thirty years ago it was the failure of another referendum on devolution that triggered outrage. For a long time it was the issue of ‘Scotland’s oil.’ Following the 2014 referendum it became the alleged failure to deliver ‘The Vow.’ If Brexit hadn’t happened, it would be an attempt to frighten a large segment of the population into believing that they faced decades of Tory austerity. If Labour were in government, it would be Corbynism … or something, in a never-ending cycle of invention.

Still, if we’re to believe recent reports, ‘invention’ may turn out to be precisely the word for what has been going on with the EU. Once upon a time the SNP were firmly anti-EU, or Common Market as it was then. Since the Brexit referendum, no party could have been clearer that Scotland’s future lay, and could only lie, in the EU. But having built an industry upon the claim, it now appears that the EU may not be so fundamental after all, with talk of continued access to the single market, the EEA or even EFTA membership all also being acceptable. The SNP seem to have woken up at last to the fact that a sizeable part of their own support (one poll claimed 36%) do not want to be members of the EU.

The same understanding of Scottish indifference or even hostility to the EU, gleaned from private Conservative focus groups or polling, is said to be part of the reason Theresa May has been adamant that there should be no separation referendum until after Brexit has happened. At the same time, reports have emerged that before the first minister’s announcement senior SNP politicians made a series of private calls to major businesses assuring them there would be no new Scottish referendum until 2021.

The public face, of course, is different. Both first minister and Alex Salmond are already into ‘sovereign will’ mode, manufacturing further outrage at Westminster’s (supposed) thwarting of the right of the Scottish people to determine their own future, ignoring the fact that that’s precisely what we did in 2014 and that the constitutional settlement they were happy to accept to get devolution clearly reserves the calling of any referendum to the UK parliament. This of course has not stopped the wilder fringes of the party, including at least one current elected councillor, raising the possibility of an advisory referendum followed by UDI (a unilateral declaration of independence) should the UK government maintain their stance. The best that can be said of that sort of nonsense is that they know not what they do.

It’s all very exciting for the media, although I do hope they don’t over-egg the pudding in their pursuit of a good story. They certainly did so when an Ipsos MORI poll for STV a week ago found, so the popular interpretation had it, that 50% of Scots wanted independence. The truth, it turned out, was more subtle. But then two days ago a YouGov poll for the Sunday Times claimed a mere 43% of people believe Scotland should be an independent country, fewer than in 2014, while 57% believe it shouldn’t. I always caution against drawing too much from a single poll, but the juxtaposition of these two, both from reputable sources, is stark. If nothing else it shows the genuine state of uncertainty we exist in.

Neither uncertainty nor excitement provide a good context for calm examination of the facts. One prediction I will stand by now is that the facts and the truth about separation and its consequences will suffer over the next months, if not years. It was the downfall of the SNP’s case for independence in 2014 (their flawed white paper) and constant vigilance will be required to subject any new case to rigorous examination. Some nationalists will never believe even a rational, evidenced and documented challenge. But there is a whole swathe of middle ground open to persuasion either way: that YouGov poll found a higher percentage of ‘Don’t knows’ on the question of independence than at any time since October 2012.

Even now, I’m not convinced that Alex Salmond’s recent cry of ‘Game on!’ is right. To extend his sporting (and gambling) analogy, there’s still all to play for. And while for some a post-truth world may be quite acceptable, many of us remember the promise of ‘once in a generation,’ unqualified by ‘… unless something big happens and we want a second bite at the cherry.’ Once upon a time on this blog I wrote ‘I hoped No Thanks! would be a short life blog not needed after 18 September [2014].’ That was naïve. The struggle will continue until separatism withers on the vine.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to First thoughts on the possibility of another Scottish referendum

  1. Sam Duncan says:

    Excellent post. And a good point about the current situation only being an excuse. They’ve never accepted the 2014 result. I remember walking down to vote in that referendum, seeing posters on every lamp-post touting the “once in a lifetime chance” (and that’s what it said; not even “generation”). I wish I’d taken photos, because the next day they were gone. The “Yes” posters weren’t. And within weeks, those very same lamp-posts sported “Yes2” stickers. It’s becoming clearer than ever that the the only way to end this is to remove the SNP from power. Until that’s done, the threat will never go away.

    And that isn’t going to be easy. The electoral calculus is against us. Salmond is fond (over-fond, if you ask me) of touting his party’s “47%” mandate. There are two things to be said about that. Firstly, so what? It’s still a minority. 53% didn’t vote for you, Alec. But, more interestingly, when you look at the proportion of the electorate, it’s astonishingly similar to the proportion who voted for the governing party at Westminster: around 25%. In terms of persuading people to get off their backsides and actively cast a vote for it, his party isn’t actually doing any better. The difference, and the trouble, is that the opposition in Scotland is fragmented among at least three other major parties, in almost every seat. Even though those parties face each other in England, they usually only do so one at a time. There are very few real three-way contests.

    Now, I’m not arguing for a single unionist party. That would be almost impossible to organize, distract even further than the nationalists already have from the problems of everyday government, and anyway, we don’t want to become another Northern Ireland (a possibility, when you look at the strength of unionist support in some areas and the argument the SNP itself has made for dissent from pan-national constitutional decisions, that’s more real than anyone will care to admit). But I don’t know what the answer is. We need to get clever.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Roger White says:

      Thanks. I agree with all of that. Assuming for the moment that there were to be another referendum a further issue might be who would lead a ‘Remain’ campaign? I’m not a gambling man like Salmond so I’m not opening a book on the subject. But I think it could be a real challenge.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Gareth says:

    Is it not possible that the SNP are agitating in advance of the pending Scottish local elections as a smoke screen? They do like to make elections proxy indyref reruns.

    The last thing they want is to be judged on their close to 10 year record of government, particularly since having rubber stamped Tory austerity councils are being gutted by cuts.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Roger White says:

      Thanks for your comments. I don’t know the full answer to your question but I’ve been keeping an eye on some of the SNP’s council election preparations. It does look as there’s evidence that some new, more abrasive candidates less focussed on local issues are likely to stand. I hope to blog about this soon.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s