The referendum a year on: 2 – What I’ve not enjoyed about Scotland in the last year

This is the second of three articles to appear on three consecutive days. The first set out some facts about political opinion in Scotland a year after the referendum. The third will describe what I have enjoyed about Scotland in the year since the referendum.

Anyone who read my account yesterday of some of the statistics around Scottish political opinion at the moment will know I was undecided whether to make today’s article about what I’ve enjoyed about Scotland this last year or what I haven’t.

I was moving towards a positive tone (after all ‘We won’, didn’t we?) but woke up, unusually early for me just after five a.m., with the thought that today was the 18th September. In that half-awake state we all experience, the memory of waking up on the same day last year swam into my consciousness. I had switched the radio on to hear the news that the referendum result had been declared – 55% No, 45% Yes. Before I drifted back to sleep today I remembered that my dominant feeling a year ago was not of triumph but of relief.

I woke later today to the radio again, this time a replay on Radio 4 of an interview Alex Salmond gave to BBC Radio Scotland yesterday. As I write I can’t track down the precise words but his argument was along the lines of ‘All changed … Trident … welfare cuts … Brexit … I believed indyref was once in a generation … indyref2 now inevitable and maybe sooner rather than later.’

I found myself speaking to the radio – ‘No, you didn’t “believe” the referendum was a once in a generation opportunity. You signed an agreement saying that it would be a decisive expression of the views of people in Scotland and a result that everyone will respect. You kept saying it was a once in a generation opportunity.’

Of course what he said yesterday isn’t new. The SNP have been punting the same line for months. But it is any wonder that this sort of relentless rolling back from their previous promises has made the last twelve months an unenjoyable year for me and many others? The relief of 19 September 2014 has been replaced by a continual unease that these people will not give up until they get their own way or wither on the vine (I am currently considering an Open University module on Advanced Vine Withering).

If the respectable face of nationalism is the 10% of the iceberg above the water line I’ve also not enjoyed the frequent emergence of the dark underbelly below – the online abusers, the rag tag and bobtail army that emerges blinking into the light of George Square to proclaim the nonsensical ‘Hope over fear’, the self-evident crazies of the Scottish Resistance Army (and my thanks to those who confirm my judgement by posting snippets of their lunacy on social media from the Army’s closed Facebook page).

There’s a nastiness around I don’t enjoy and I would have to admit it is not confined to those who shout loudly for independence.

Even when government policy is being pursued (quite legitimately of course) through parliament there is a feeling it’s often not for the betterment of the people of Scotland but to support the SNP’s one over-riding aim of separation. Scotland is different, but what better way to make us want to be separate than to exaggerate existing differences and create new ones, inappropriate imposition of Gaelic on non-Gaelic speaking areas being one of them? And what better way to increase the control of the SNP by centralising so many public services and arguing for control of the BBC to be devolved to the Scottish parliament? None of this bodes well for a plural and open Scotland.

With all this floating round I know I am one of many who avoid discussing politics with people whose views they don’t know, at least face to face. I feel two spaces hover around me, a relaxed day to day non-political space and an edgier political cul-de-sac that I try to avoid entering.

I’ve written about most of these things over the last year or so. But today’s not a time to scatter my thoughts with links to other articles on No Thanks! You can find them if you want. Today and tomorrow is a time to set down my feelings as honestly as I can. And despite everything, I remain positive. They will not win. So tomorrow, when I have good reason to be positive as you’ll find out – what I’ve enjoyed about Scotland in the last year.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to The referendum a year on: 2 – What I’ve not enjoyed about Scotland in the last year

  1. What I’ve not enjoyed is the way in which the Nationalists are allowed to make false claims that are unchallenged by the opposition and mainstream media. They then repeat them so often that they become accepted wisdom. One is that they started the referendum campaign 70-30 down, so losing 55-45 shows momentum that will continue.
    The oldest poll on John Curtice’s What Scotland Thinks blog, from February 2013 shows No ahead 59-41 (all these figures are excluding Don’t Knows). There was a run of 67-33, 65-35, 67-33 and 71-29 in April-May 2013, but the final poll of May and the next one, in July, both predicted the actual outcome of 55-45. There was a 69-31 in September, but there was also one putting Yes ahead 51-49 in August, although I’ve a vague memory that it asked a loaded question, likely to produce responses with the heart rather than the head. The highest No vote recorded in 2014 was 64% in February.
    The tables and charts on John’s blog don’t say which pollster compiled each poll, but I’m sure that one (Survation?) consistently produced higher Yes votes than the others. A commenter on his blog criticised John’s poll of polls on the grounds that if one pollster says 65% and another 55% the correct answer isn’t 60%: it’s that the methodology of one of them is wrong. Having said that, his final poll of poll was 52-48 for No with a 3% error margin, so the result was within its range.
    The Yes campaigners certainly narrowed the gap over the campaign, but not by as much as they claim, and the people they converted were probably Don’t Knows, very soft Nos or those who voted Yes for reasons of socialist republicanism rather than nationalism.

    Another Nationalist myth is the Vow, which they exaggerate in two ways. Firstly, they claim that it had more significance than was the case. A poll about why people voted said that 4% of the 55% were influenced by it, meaning that the vote would have been 53-47 No without it. The Nationalists ignore the ‘of the 55%’ part to make it appear that it would otherwise have been 51-49.
    Secondly, they claim that it promised far more than it actually did, allowing them to make the false claim that No voters were somehow betrayed.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.